Fourteen products, one enterprise-wide security program

Insecure local data storage in consumer-facing mobile apps, exposing PII and device usage data.

Authentication weaknesses across all 11 mobile applications, creating a broad and consistent attack surface.

API security gaps in dealer and enterprise distribution network applications, enabling unauthorized data access.

IoT device communication vulnerabilities in the broker platform and update infrastructure.

Insecure web API endpoints exposing backend device management functions to unauthorized parties.

Session management and authentication token handling weaknesses across the full mobile app portfolio.

Enterprises with large mobile app portfolios (10+ apps).

IoT and connected device manufacturers.

Consumer electronics companies with dealer and distribution digital networks.

Businesses needing standardized security across multiple applications.

Why test 14 products as one program instead of 14 engagements?

Consistent findings across apps, like the same authentication weakness repeating in all 11 mobile apps, only become visible when one team tests the whole portfolio together and can compare notes across products.

Does app store approval mean the app is secure?

No. App store review checks policy compliance and basic functionality, not authentication design, local storage handling, or API authorization, which is where most of these findings lived.

How do you prioritize fixes across 14 products?

By shared root cause. A weakness that repeats across the mobile portfolio gets fixed once at the pattern level rather than 11 times individually, which is faster and reduces the chance of an inconsistent fix.

What happens to the IoT-specific findings?

They are handled separately from the app findings because device communication and update infrastructure have a different threat model and often a different engineering team.